the index · September 2026 · v

Every legal AI tool, scored on the questions that end up in an incident report.

Where does the data rest? Does privilege survive normal use? Can you evidence what the tool did? What does the seat price become in year two? Eighteen tools, five weighted criteria, one method — and no vendor has ever paid us a penny.

18tools reviewed 5weighted criteria £0vendor payments 0tier A awarded so far
the five criteria
Why no tool has an A yet. An A means we would put client data through it under a written policy without further caveats. Several tools here are close. None is there, and we would rather hold the top grade empty than hand it out for a good demo.
18 of 18 tools shown

Harvey

Harvey AI
78 /100 B
Legal research · Firm copilots

The enterprise legal-AI default: research, drafting and analysis over firm content, with the procurement paperwork to match the price.

Data protection21
Confidentiality19
Evidential transparency14
Professional usability13
Commercial honesty11
Sep 2026read the review →

Legora

Legora
80 /100 B
Legal research · Drafting & writing

A fast-moving assistant with strong tabular review and Word-native drafting; popular with transactional teams that want output they can edit, not just read.

Data protection21
Confidentiality19
Evidential transparency16
Professional usability13
Commercial honesty11
Sep 2026read the review →

CoCounsel

Thomson Reuters
81 /100 B
Legal research

Research, summarisation and review anchored to a first-party citator — the most defensible answer in the category to the hallucinated-citation problem.

Data protection21
Confidentiality19
Evidential transparency18
Professional usability11
Commercial honesty12
Sep 2026read the review →

Vincent AI

vLex
74 /100 B
Legal research

Research assistant over a large international corpus, with citation-first answers and a breadth that suits cross-border work.

Data protection20
Confidentiality18
Evidential transparency15
Professional usability11
Commercial honesty10
Sep 2026read the review →

Spellbook

Spellbook
64 /100 C
Drafting & writing · Contracts & CLM

The easiest install in the category: a Word add-in that drafts and redlines where fee-earners already work. The trade is a thin evidential trail.

Data protection15
Confidentiality16
Evidential transparency9
Professional usability14
Commercial honesty10
Sep 2026read the review →

Definely

Definely
76 /100 B
Drafting & writing · Contracts & CLM

Defined-term navigation and drafting support built by lawyers who were tired of scrolling: strong on the mechanics of getting a document internally consistent.

Data protection20
Confidentiality20
Evidential transparency17
Professional usability11
Commercial honesty8
Sep 2026read the review →

Clearbrief

Clearbrief
72 /100 B
Drafting & writing

Brief and submission drafting with citation verification against the record — the rare tool whose main job is checking someone else's work.

Data protection19
Confidentiality20
Evidential transparency18
Professional usability10
Commercial honesty5
Sep 2026read the review →

Luminance

Luminance
76 /100 B
Contracts & CLM · eDiscovery & disclosure

Contract review and negotiation at volume, sold on legal-specific models rather than general-purpose LLMs, with an established diligence pedigree.

Data protection20
Confidentiality18
Evidential transparency15
Professional usability12
Commercial honesty11
Sep 2026read the review →

Robin AI

Robin AI
72 /100 B
Contracts & CLM

UK-built contract copilot pairing software with human review services — pragmatic for firms that want the work done as well as the tool installed.

Data protection22
Confidentiality19
Evidential transparency14
Professional usability11
Commercial honesty6
Sep 2026read the review →

Juro

Juro
70 /100 C
Contracts & CLM

Browser-native contract collaboration and lifecycle tool with AI drafting assistance — strongest where the problem is process, not drafting.

Data protection21
Confidentiality17
Evidential transparency14
Professional usability12
Commercial honesty6
Sep 2026read the review →

LawGeex

LawGeex
62 /100 C
Contracts & CLM

Automated contract review against your playbook, mature as a rules-plus-ML system and consequently predictable — in both senses.

Data protection17
Confidentiality16
Evidential transparency10
Professional usability11
Commercial honesty8
Sep 2026read the review →

Kira

Litera
77 /100 B
Contracts & CLM · eDiscovery & disclosure

The diligence workhorse: pre-built clause models and extraction that a court or a client can follow, now being replatformed with generative features.

Data protection20
Confidentiality21
Evidential transparency17
Professional usability9
Commercial honesty10
Sep 2026read the review →

Relativity aiR

Relativity
74 /100 B
eDiscovery & disclosure

Generative review inside the platform the litigation market already uses — court-credible workflows with the newest layer honestly boxed as a first pass.

Data protection18
Confidentiality20
Evidential transparency17
Professional usability10
Commercial honesty9
Sep 2026read the review →

Everlaw

Everlaw
79 /100 B
eDiscovery & disclosure

Modern, fast eDiscovery with a genuinely good user experience and transparent self-service pricing — rare in a category built on opacity.

Data protection19
Confidentiality20
Evidential transparency17
Professional usability12
Commercial honesty11
Sep 2026read the review →

iManage Copilot

iManage
80 /100 B
Firm copilots

Generative assistance inside the document management system the firm already trusts — the most boring and most defensible architecture in the index.

Data protection22
Confidentiality21
Evidential transparency15
Professional usability11
Commercial honesty11
Sep 2026read the review →

ndMAX

NetDocuments
75 /100 B
Firm copilots

NetDocuments' AI layer: pattern-based drafting, summarisation and matter Q&A inside the DMS, with the same permissions story as its rival.

Data protection21
Confidentiality20
Evidential transparency14
Professional usability10
Commercial honesty10
Sep 2026read the review →

Thirdfort

Thirdfort
62 /100 C
Intake, KYC & AML

Combined identity verification and source-of-funds checks built with law firms in mind — strong on evidence capture, weaker on the proportionality judgement regulation 33 actually requires.

Data protection18
Confidentiality14
Evidential transparency11
Professional usability13
Commercial honesty6
Sep 2026read the review →

Legl

Legl
71 /100 C
Intake, KYC & AML

Client onboarding, payments and AML workflow in one place, with a compliance-shaped audit trail that our reviewers can follow.

Data protection20
Confidentiality16
Evidential transparency13
Professional usability14
Commercial honesty8
Sep 2026read the review →