Clearbrief
Brief and submission drafting with citation verification against the record — the rare tool whose main job is checking someone else's work.
Tier B — conditional. Verification-first design is exactly the discipline regulators are asking for, and it measurably reduces the failure mode everyone fears. The commercial score is low because the pricing conversation is opaque from the outside; get a written quote before a pilot.
What it does
Litigation drafting, statement-of-case and skeleton-argument support, with factual citations checked against the bundle.
Where it holds up
- Citations check back to the underlying record, not just a database
- Built around review, which suits supervision workflows
- Strong fit with disclosure-heavy litigation
Where it doesn't
- Opaque public pricing
- Narrow practice fit — litigation only
- Smaller vendor, so assurances are newer
Data posture, as documented
What the vendor's own material and terms say — and where the answer was not published, we say so rather than guess.
| location | US/UK hosting |
| training | No-training position published |
| retention | Matter-scoped |
| subprocessors | Short list; confirm in writing |
What it costs, realistically
Quoted per firm/team; not published. Ask for seat and matter-count maths.
Who it suits
Litigation teams where a miscited bundle is the nightmare scenario.
Non-contentious practices.
How we assessed it
Documentation review; verification workflow assessed on the published description.
Review history
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| Sep 2026 | First entry. Commercial score reflects unpublished commercial terms. |