Relativity aiR
Generative review inside the platform the litigation market already uses — court-credible workflows with the newest layer honestly boxed as a first pass.
Tier B — conditional. The audit trail is best-in-class because the platform was built for defensibility. Watch the commercial layer: know whether you are buying the platform licence or your service provider's margin, because the answer changes the maths by a factor.
What it does
Document review, summarisation, privilege and relevance workflows inside RelativityOne.
Where it holds up
- Review workflows designed to withstand challenge
- Deep integration with existing litigation infrastructure
- Generative features scoped as assistance, not authority
Where it doesn't
- Cost stack is opaque when bought through providers
- Heavy implementation
- Overkill outside litigation
Data posture, as documented
What the vendor's own material and terms say — and where the answer was not published, we say so rather than guess.
| location | Regional RelativityOne hosting |
| training | No training on matter data |
| retention | Matter lifecycle controlled by the firm |
| subprocessors | Documented |
What it costs, realistically
Licence plus provider fees. Get the full stack quoted, not the licence alone.
Who it suits
Litigation and investigation teams with volume disclosure.
Transactional practices.
How we assessed it
Documentation review; commercial score reflects pass-through pricing complexity.
Review history
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| Sep 2026 | First entry. |