Definely
Defined-term navigation and drafting support built by lawyers who were tired of scrolling: strong on the mechanics of getting a document internally consistent.
Tier B — conditional, and the highest confidentiality score we have given a drafting tool: it does less with your data, which is a feature. The commercial model is the friction point — expect a conversation about seats you did not plan to buy.
What it does
Definition checking, cross-reference navigation, drafting and comparison inside Word.
Where it holds up
- Definition and cross-reference integrity is genuinely hard to do by eye
- Conservative data posture — narrow scope, fewer moving parts
- Word-native and quick to learn
Where it doesn't
- Narrower use case than general assistants
- Per-seat economics bite on large teams
- Value depends on document complexity
Data posture, as documented
What the vendor's own material and terms say — and where the answer was not published, we say so rather than guess.
| location | UK/EU |
| training | No training on customer content per published position |
| retention | Minimal retention; document-scoped processing |
| subprocessors | Short list relative to category norms |
What it costs, realistically
Per-seat, annual. Plan the rollout before you expand seats.
Who it suits
Transactional teams drowning in defined terms and cross-references.
Firms wanting one assistant to cover everything.
How we assessed it
Documentation review; definition-integrity behaviour tested on synthetic agreements.
Review history
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| Sep 2026 | First entry. |